Supercars explains Bathurst 1000 parity decision
- 7 months ago
#supercarsbathurst #explains1000 #paritydecisions #hindi
Supercars advised Ford that the proposed parity changes were not approved by the teams in Bathurst 1000. Ford hoped set a setting to the body of Mustang shift the aerodynamic balance back. However, he was rejected after a series of meetings before and during the installation day last night last night. The data obtained from latest races, Supercars used and therefore, according to the championship, "Parity examination system under Bathurst 1000 for a parity setting for a scope." In particular, description explains that “all super car sets” will consent to change in absence of trigger, which is a threshold greater than 75 percent that must be given to super car board. Ford teams call the parity status as “unacceptable ,, while the Ford Motor Company claims that recently released CFD data proves that there is an inequality between Mustang and Chevrolet Camaro. Practical 1, 1320 Local timeAEDT for Repco Bathurst 1000. Supercars' full expression Throughout the year, our teams followed a parity review system for the Repco Supercars Championship and directed Supercars. The parity examination system has a triggering point of a potential parity imbalance shown in of the five consecutive races or consecutive races. As mentioned in system, the foreseeing triggers, which exhibit a imbalance, are not currently met and there is no scope for a adjustment under examination system for Bathurst 1000. Supercars received a parity adjustment request from Ford Homologation team before the Parity Review system before Repco Baturst 1000. Supercars has evaluated request in accordance with requirements of rules and regulations requiring approval to implement required parity adjustment change from all Supercars teams. After many meetings with all teams and key stakeholders, the necessary approval was not established from Supercars teams to support the requested parity adjustment for 2023 Repco Baturst 1000. We value inputs perspectives of all relevant parties aim to continue working to maintain the integrity of our sport rules regulations that manages it.
Supercars advised Ford that the proposed parity changes were not approved by the teams in Bathurst 1000. Ford hoped set a setting to the body of Mustang shift the aerodynamic balance back. However, he was rejected after a series of meetings before and during the installation day last night last night. The data obtained from latest races, Supercars used and therefore, according to the championship, "Parity examination system under Bathurst 1000 for a parity setting for a scope." In particular, description explains that “all super car sets” will consent to change in absence of trigger, which is a threshold greater than 75 percent that must be given to super car board. Ford teams call the parity status as “unacceptable ,, while the Ford Motor Company claims that recently released CFD data proves that there is an inequality between Mustang and Chevrolet Camaro. Practical 1, 1320 Local timeAEDT for Repco Bathurst 1000. Supercars' full expression Throughout the year, our teams followed a parity review system for the Repco Supercars Championship and directed Supercars. The parity examination system has a triggering point of a potential parity imbalance shown in of the five consecutive races or consecutive races. As mentioned in system, the foreseeing triggers, which exhibit a imbalance, are not currently met and there is no scope for a adjustment under examination system for Bathurst 1000. Supercars received a parity adjustment request from Ford Homologation team before the Parity Review system before Repco Baturst 1000. Supercars has evaluated request in accordance with requirements of rules and regulations requiring approval to implement required parity adjustment change from all Supercars teams. After many meetings with all teams and key stakeholders, the necessary approval was not established from Supercars teams to support the requested parity adjustment for 2023 Repco Baturst 1000. We value inputs perspectives of all relevant parties aim to continue working to maintain the integrity of our sport rules regulations that manages it.